[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.27 sysctl
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 11:56, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>>Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:42:07PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>>>>This is making the sysctl code acutally be written in C.
>>>>It wasn't mostly due to georgeous ommitted size array "forward
>>>>declarations". As a side effect it makes the table structure easier to
>>>Please don't remove the trailing commas in the enums. they make adding
>>>to them much easier and are allowed by gcc (and maybe C99, I'm not
>>It's an GNU-ism. If you have any problem with "adding vales", just
>>invent some dummy end-value. I have a problem with using -pedantic.
> You seem to have it permanently engaged 8)
> If you are upset about that GNUism why doesn't your patch fix the other
> GNU-isms in the same file ? Also the entire kernel is *full* of GNU C
> extensions.

That's a common rumour. struct inits are going to go anyway.
The rest is only about 30 ({ ... }) in inclue/linux.
Of course some of the GNU extensions are actually usefull.
Trailing , at enum declarations make up for a nice shift reduce conflict
expirence in yacc. (And perhaps slower compilation...)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.132 / U:6.988 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site