[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: memory leak?
Alan Cox <> writes:

> > > This memory will be reclaimed when the system needs it.
> >
> > Does this mean that free and /proc/meminfo are incorrect?
> By its own definition proc/meminfo is correct. top could go rummaging in
> /proc/slabinfo but its questionable if it is meaningful to do so. The
> actually "out of memory" case for a virtual memory system is not "no
> memory pages free" nor "no memory or swap free" its closer to "working
> set plus i/o buffers exceeds memory size".

Why can't proc/meminfo report these caches as cached instead of plain
used? Would that be incorrect somehow?

Måns Rullgård
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.062 / U:1.744 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site