[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] VM strict overcommit

    On 21 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
    > Thats fine be me too. I just grabbed the usual boilerplate but see
    > COPYING is just fine

    Good. I hate the fact that so many people seem to think that adding 15
    lines of copyright notice to a file somehow makes it "more legal". All it
    does is to give some corporate lawyer a bone, and take up precious
    real-estate on the first thing you see when you open the file that could
    be used to actually say what the file does (and who has worked on it).

    Slightly off-topic, but in the same vein: I also dislike having tons of
    changelogs that relate to matters that aren't relevant to the sources any
    more (because the changes _changed_ them, duh!). The changelogs are valid
    as a way to show who worked on what, of course, but some people seem to
    take them to be the beginning of their Great Novel.

    I'm hoping that one of the things BK does is to make people less inclined
    to write change stories in the C files, and more inclined to explain them
    to me in email when they send the changes in. At which point they are
    there in a format where you can actually see the "before and after"
    picture, not just get a feeling that "it looked different before" - well,


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.041 / U:64.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site