Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: more thoughts on a new jail() system call | From | Shaya Potter <> | Date | 19 Jul 2002 12:35:19 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 23:06, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > >> sys_vhangup) NOT SURE - Should be fine, right? > > > > Seems ok to me. > > Have fun with devpts.
what would happen if a jail had virtualized ttys? i.e. they each had tty1,2,3,4..... and this was transalted to an open real tty when needed, and the transalation mapping being kept in the prison struct?
> > >> sys_getsid) NOT SURE - whats it for? > > > > You shouldn't be able to call getsid() on some other > > process outside the jail. Also, calling getsid() on > > yourself might reveal information about your parent, > > like getppid() or getpgid() (minor). > > Your parent ought to be 1.
yes.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |