Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:33:27 +0100 | From | Anton Altaparmakov <> | Subject | Re: Remain Calm: Designated initializer patches for 2.5 |
| |
At 07:56 18/07/02, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>Well, I also like the non C99 variant that is in gcc as well, but if gcc is >>going to drop that in the future in favour of the C99 standard... But yes, >>not having the spacing is _ugly_, what I'm doing is: >>static struct proto_ops SOCKOPS_WRAPPED(atalk_dgram_ops) = { >> .family = PF_APPLETALK, >> .release = atalk_release, >> .bind = atalk_bind, >> .connect = atalk_connect, >> .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair, >> .accept = sock_no_accept, > >Agreed, that's the way to do it.
Yes, the patch for ntfs that just found its way into my inbox is _really_ ugly... Something like the above would be much nicer.
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |