[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4
    On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 11:56, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

    > What should have happened is each of the tasks need only about
    > 4k until they actually access something. Since they can't possibly
    > access everything at once, we need to fault in pages as needed,
    > not all at once. This is what 'overcomit' is, and it is necessary.

    Then do not enable strict overcommit, Dick.

    > If you have 'fixed' something so that no RAM ever has to be paged
    > you have a badly broken system.

    That is not the intention of Alan or I's work at all.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.021 / U:14.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site