[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] new module format

    On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

    > But I don't see why this needs to be a two step process:
    > module support calls mod->cleanup
    > module code checks number of users
    > if none, unregister all interfaces
    > otherwise return -EBUSY
    > if return wasn't -EBUSY, free all resources

    So after you checked for users, someone starts using the module again,
    before you were able to remove all interfaces -> OOPS.
    This is exactly the reason why I prefer to make this explicit in the
    module interface - the chances are higher to get this right.

    > > It's possible to use the filesystem model, but it's unnecessary complex
    > > and inflexible.
    > What is the complex and inflexible part?

    It has to work around the problem that cleanup_module() can't fail.

    > > Another problem is that the more interfaces a module has (e.g. proc), the
    > > harder it becomes to unload a module (or the easier it becomes to prevent
    > > the unloading of a module).
    > I don't see that this makes any difference at all.

    It's currently impossible to force the unloading of a module, some user
    can always keep a reference to the module. Even if you kill the process,
    someone else can get a new reference, before you could unload the module.

    > I'm proposing to add a return code to mod->cleanup (and pick a better
    > name). Yes, every module will have to be fixed to use this interface, but
    > why not?

    I don't disagree, but if we break the module interface anyway, why don't
    we clean it up properly?
    (Patches that do that will follow shortly.)

    > Anyway, you're proposing to do it backwards. We need to first ensure
    > there are no users, then unregister the interfaces.

    That's broken (see above).

    bye, Roman

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.023 / U:35.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site