Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/13] minimal rmap | Date | Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:46:15 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 22:42, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:37, Rik van Riel wrote: > > I don't agree with this, for a very simple reason. > > > > The current rmap patch was created in order to change the > > VM behaviour as little as possible and ONLY provide an > > infrastructure. Benchmarking a completely untuned thing > > that was built to not change anything is bound to give > > meaningless results. > > > > I say we _use_ the infrastructure that akpm is trying to > > get merged now in order to implement something useful. > > I do agree with Rik here. Once the basic rmap infrastructure is merged > we need to work on implementing stuff on top of it or else there is no > point.
Well then we all agree, because that's just what I said.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |