Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:54:54 -0600 (MDT) | From | Thunder from the hill <> | Subject | Re: close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks) |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Elladan wrote: > Two threads share the file descriptor table. > > 1. Thread 1 performs close() on a file descriptor. close fails. > 2. Thread 2 performs open(). > * 3. Thread 1 performs close() again, just to make sure.
Thread 2 shouldn't be able to reuse a currently open fd. This application design is seriously broken.
Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |