[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: HZ, preferably as small as possible
    On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 22:06, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > I've never had good reason to believe the latency/perf benefits myself,
    > but I was approached at OLS about problems with something as simple as
    > DVD playing, where a 100Hz timer means that the DVD player ends up
    > having to busy-loop on gettimeofday() because it cannot sanely sleep due
    > to the lack in sufficient sleeping granularity.

    A cleaner solution to this issue is a higher resolution timer, e.g. the
    high-res-timers project which has high resolution POSIX timers.

    We could still bump HZ, of course...

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.020 / U:70.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site