Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Jul 2002 22:15:29 +0200 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5 |
| |
[OT stuff scrapped]
> >I honestly doubt ext3 would perform significantly worse than what I've > >observed with reiserfs. > Just try it, I did try it.
Someone else will have to carry out the test, I really can't free up any of my partitions for a re-mkfs.
> >Never mind, however, the sole aim of my having tested the extraction of > >rock.tar.bz2 was to show how easily you get to accuse people on lkml of > >being incompetent w/o having any real support for your claims. > > It was (as I mentioned before) to show that there need to be some sort > of high level coordination to make Linux better and address the needs of the > future.
Works great from what I can tell.
> >> >PS. Solaris is over 60% slower than Linux 2.2/2.4 in common fs > >> >operations on my SMP SPARCstation 10. > >> > >> If you make such statements, it would help a lot of you would mention > >> the Solaris version you are running. I am always running a recent > >> Solaris beta kernel - you may have used an outdated version. > > >Umm, let's see if I can fish out the install media from somewhere... > >jup, Solaris 2.6 5/98. > > So did you compare Solaris performance with a 4 year old Linux?
No, but you did the comparison with the most recent version of Solaris for me, only it was on IA-32. And the result is still the same, Linux wins hands down.
T. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |