lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:56:07PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> > if 2.4/2.5 AFFS is in sync as you say (which iirc it is), then
> > I fail to see how you think the 2.5.25 disassembly is an old version.
> The last disassembled instruction is the PageUptodate() test, which was
> moved in later versions and can't be that early in the function for a
> recent version, but the disassembly is exactly what I would expect from
> an old affs version.

Hmm, interesting. Time to test the possibility of a ccache bug I think.
How old exactly out of curiosity ?

Dave

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans