Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:14:56 +0200 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8 |
| |
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:56:07PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > if 2.4/2.5 AFFS is in sync as you say (which iirc it is), then > > I fail to see how you think the 2.5.25 disassembly is an old version. > The last disassembled instruction is the PageUptodate() test, which was > moved in later versions and can't be that early in the function for a > recent version, but the disassembly is exactly what I would expect from > an old affs version.
Hmm, interesting. Time to test the possibility of a ccache bug I think. How old exactly out of curiosity ?
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |