Messages in this thread | | | From | Cort Dougan <> | Date | Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:02:44 -0600 | Subject | Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit |
| |
Large PTE's aren't free either, though. Cheap enough to implement but there's some fragmentation that isn't easy to deal with in some pathological cases. The virtual space is pretty tight on some archs already.
A lot of stock distributions load most drivers as modules so a machine well stocked with devices may run into trouble.
} Modules can be mapped using a large PTE mapping. } I've been meaning to do this on sparc64 for a long } time. } } So this TLB argument alone is not sufficient :-) } I do concur on the "ipv4 as module is difficult to } get correct" argument however. } - } To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in } the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org } More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html } Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |