Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:34:21 +0200 (CEST) | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? |
| |
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Thomas Tonino wrote:
>... > So we're going with 2.4.19-pre9-aa2 for now. I don't yet understand the > -aa series, for example how 2.4.19-rc1-aa1 would relate to > 2.4.19-pre9-aa2, so I'm a bit wary of just upgrading in the -aa series > right now.
The -aa patches are usually against the most recent 2.4 kernel (they are usually only available against one specific kernel), IOW the following are increasing version numbers:
2.4.18-aa1 2.4.18-pre8-aa1 2.4.19-pre9-aa1 2.4.19-pre9-aa2 2.4.19-rc1-aa1 (rc = "release candidate") 2.4.19-aa1 2.4.20-pre1-aa1
> Thomas
cu Adrian
--
You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |