lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002
Hi,

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Are there any reasons why these don't make it into 2.5?
>
> > - Better event logging for enterprise systems

Linus was scared we could break old syslog parsers.

> > - Linux booting ELF images

Reason unknown. I expect some statement here.

> > - First pass at LinuxBIOS support

Possibly no one had one? I have some boxes running prettily on LinuxBIOS,
can't imagine why it isn't merged into 2.5. But I can't imagine what's
speaking against KBuild-2.5 either. I can speak it, I love it.

> > - Build option for Linux Trace Toolkit (LTT)

Nobody seemed to be interested in this toolkit. The (s|l)trace toolkit and
kdb seemed to be sufficient for the most developers. (I don't whine here
either.)
> > - Scalable CPU bitmasks

Seems they got lost.

Regards,
Thunder
--
(Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode)
------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$
N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G
e++++ h* r--- y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans