Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 06 Jun 2002 16:03:26 +0200 | From | Peter Wächtler <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel |
| |
Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:52, Peter Wächtler wrote: > >>Daniel Phillips wrote: >> >>>Our current block queue design would benefit a lot from the kind of >>>thinking that would be required to make it realtime. >>> >>You know that spinning disks do some recalibrations? >> >>Whatever marketing tries to imply with "realtime volumes" - the >>technology only tries to make better promises (think of AV disks >>for better sustained rate). >> > > It's my impression that some do thermal recalibration and some don't: > > http://www.pctechguide.com/04disks.htm > "recalibration" >
> > The need to turn in reliable performance for multimedia apps seems > to have made thermal calibration a thing of the past, but thanks for > raising the issue. >
Ok, seems that I am a bit outdated (here) :-)
> >>LynxOS (now LynuxWorks) has some patents for priority based IO. >> > > Oh, more of those one-click realtime patents ;-) Do you have any > pointers? >
http://www.lynuxworks.com/products/whitepapers/patentedio.php3
In the upper right corner you can see the patent number. Try a search for patent on this side.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |