lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken)
Date
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:09:30 -0700, "jdow" <jdow@earthlink.net> wrote:

>From: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>
>> > A microkernel design was actually made to work once, with good performance.
>> > It was about fifteen years ago, in the amiga. Know how they pulled it off?
>> > Commodore used a mutant ultra-cheap 68030 that had -NO- memory management
>> > unit.
>>
>> Vanilla 68000 actually. And it never worked well - the UI folks had
>> to use a library not threads. The fs performance sucked
>
>Some things just cannot be passed by..... The Amiga HAS worked well and
>DOES work well - - - FINALLY. (It took several years and a VERY serious
>debugging effort with Bill Hawes and Bryce Nesbitt finding and quashing
>all manner of bad or missing pointer checks and the like. They made the
>OS itself a remarkable work of art.)

Was that the same Bill Hawes who hung around L-K quashing bugs for a
year or so (maybe 3-4 years ago?)

john alvord
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:1.620 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site