Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:10:59 -0500 | From | Nathan Straz <> | Subject | Re: 2.2 and 2.4 performance issues |
| |
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:55:55PM +0100, Luis Pedro de Moura Ribeiro Pinto wrote: > I was asked (i'm a company freshman) to perform some tests between > kernel versions 2.2 and 2.4, and after awhile searching i found a good > set of benchmarking tools (aim7) from Caldera linux.
Benchmarks are evil. Sure they are useful at times, but for the most part they get misused. IMHO, aim7 is outdated. The I/O it does it all very small for today's systems. It's like poking the system with hundreds of needles. You have no idea how the system will react to a golf club, baseball bat, sledgehammer or a wet noodle. Sure, some people really like it and swear by it. Benchmarking is better done with an application set in mind and best done with the application set itself.
> Are there better way to perform the test besides using benchmark tools > like this?
Run the applications you really care about. There is also a good set of benchmarks, including application specific ones at http://lbs.sourceforge.net/.
-- Nate Straz nstraz@sgi.com sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |