[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] Re: Shrinking ext3 directories
    On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Andreas Dilger wrote:

    > Remember also that each leaf block merge will incur a copy from the tail
    > block (which may need to be read from disk) and then a truncate to drop
    > that block. We _could_ leave some number of empty dir blocks at the end
    > of the directory file if we had some sort of dir prealloc scheme happening.
    > There would be some amount of hysteresis there to avoid the repeated
    > alloc/free overhead (i.e. keep no more than 8 free blocks, but allocate
    > 8 blocks at a time if you need more).

    Wouldn't the hysteresis be the frag or block size? Is there benefit to
    truncating if it doesn't free any disk space? Actually, there might be
    benefit to leaving a few empty blocks at the end of the dir when doing
    trunc as a means of reducing alloc.

    bill davidsen <>
    CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.020 / U:8.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site