Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:31:18 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1 |
| |
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:47:29AM +0200, Dave Jones wrote: > > I'll take a look at this tomorrow, unless William "no sleep `til 2.6" Irwin > > beats me to it 8-) (he did this part of the patch iirc). > > How does this look? (compiles, boots, & runs on UP i386)
looks good to me - what do you think about my other pidhash suggestion:
> And i'm not quite sure whether it's needed to expose the pidhash to the > rest of the kernel - it would be much simpler to have it in > kernel/fork.c locally, and find_task_by_pid() would be a function > instead of an inline. (it has a ~49 bytes footprint on x86, it's rather > heavy i think.)
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |