[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1
On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 17:07, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> obviously not. Supporting 4G cpus is enough for this century, so the
> other 32bit would be just wasted space. the 1 in the shiftleft needs the
> UL anyways to be correct with >32 cpus (it's not strictly a bug right
> now to forget the UL but if we get it right we'll be able to go 64-way
> on 64bit systems with no change other than NR_TASKS). So the bitmasks
> must be all unsigned longs, the cpu numbers are definitely fine as
> unsigned ints.

Eh, very true. I was confusing the bitmasks and the counts.

Sorry, Ingo - ignore me.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.103 / U:3.984 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site