[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1
    On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 17:07, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > obviously not. Supporting 4G cpus is enough for this century, so the
    > other 32bit would be just wasted space. the 1 in the shiftleft needs the
    > UL anyways to be correct with >32 cpus (it's not strictly a bug right
    > now to forget the UL but if we get it right we'll be able to go 64-way
    > on 64bit systems with no change other than NR_TASKS). So the bitmasks
    > must be all unsigned longs, the cpu numbers are definitely fine as
    > unsigned ints.

    Eh, very true. I was confusing the bitmasks and the counts.

    Sorry, Ingo - ignore me.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.022 / U:4.616 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site