[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Replace timer_bh with tasklet
    On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 19:01, David S. Miller wrote:

    > That isn't in the tree now. We can only make analsis of the patch
    > based upon what is in 2.5.x right now, you can't base it on what
    > might be added in the future.

    Could there possibly be any interaction between SERIAL_BH and TIMER_BH?

    I guess my stance is if each BH-removal patch figures out its
    syncronization issues, each should be fine regardless of what the other
    BHs do.

    The timer_bh runs often but touches a comprehensible amount of data.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.029 / U:6.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site