[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Replace timer_bh with tasklet
On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 19:01, David S. Miller wrote:

> That isn't in the tree now. We can only make analsis of the patch
> based upon what is in 2.5.x right now, you can't base it on what
> might be added in the future.

Could there possibly be any interaction between SERIAL_BH and TIMER_BH?

I guess my stance is if each BH-removal patch figures out its
syncronization issues, each should be fine regardless of what the other
BHs do.

The timer_bh runs often but touches a comprehensible amount of data.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.179 / U:7.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site