Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Jun 2002 04:56:06 +1000 | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: Question about sched_yield() |
| |
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:46:29 -0700 David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> wrote: > "The sched_yield() function shall force the running thread to relinquish the > processor until it again becomes the head of its thread list. It takes no > arguments."
Notice how incredibly useless this definition is. It's even defined in terms of UP.
Rusty. -- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |