Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:57:02 -0400 | From | Kurt Wall <> | Subject | Re: vfat patch for shortcut display as symlinks for 2.4.18 |
| |
Also sprach Ryan Cumming: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On June 12, 2002 19:25, Kurt Wall wrote: > > That's *precisely* the point I tried to make. .desktop files are > > just plain text files, as far as Unix is concerned. They do not map > > neatly to Windows .lnk files because the kernel's file system layer > > does not handle them specially, as it does symlinks. God and Bill > > Gates alone know how Windows handles .lnk files, but it does seem > > that Windows imputes to them special semantics, rather like a shell > > script. > > No, some people actually know how Windows works. The kernel has very > little to do with .lnk files, and in fact it sees them as regular > files. If you run "notepad foo.lnk", you will see the link's binary > contents. If you use the CreateFile or OpenFile kernel calls, you will > get a file handle pointing to the link's contents. If you attempt to > execute a .lnk file from the command line or using CreateProcess, it > will horribly fail. > > In fact, to dereference a link in userspace, you must open the .lnk > file, examine its contents with a library call, and then open the > destination file. This is extremely similar to how Gnome or KDE > handle .desktop files: mainly in the shell.
Okay. I readily admit that I do not know how Windows works. I stand corrected.
Kurt -- Happiness, n.: An agreeable sensation arising from contemplating the misery of another. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |