lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19
Użytkownik Russell King napisał:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
>>Użytkownik Russell King napisał:
>>
>>>GCC 3.x introduces the dodgy practice of removing the frame pointer
>>>from every function despite telling the compiler not to with
>>>-fno-omit-frame-pointer. It's also contary to the GCC documentation
>>>when it interferes with debugging.
>>
>>This can not be true - since otherwise task switching wouldn't work
>>at all!
>
>
> It is indeed true. From your comment, it looks like you don't understand
> the ARM architecture/what a frame pointer is.

Well I surely understand what a pointer to the local variable set is.
I know pascal and gdb well enough :-). However what I may have
missed is that ARM is using some other task switch mechanism.
I would be courious to see what it is?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.078 / U:1.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site