Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 1 Jun 2002 02:34:25 -0500 (CDT) | From | Kai Germaschewski <> | Subject | Re: Kernel compile quiet mode |
| |
[Answered a follow-up mail and didn't realize that l-k was CC'ed in the first one, so here's my reply again.]
>From kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu Sat Jun 1 02:30:31 2002 Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 02:27:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski <kai-germaschewski@uiowa.edu> To: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net> Subject: Re: Kernel compile quiet mode
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > gcc $CFLAGS -DKBUILD_BASENAME=raw -c -o raw.o raw.c > > gcc $CFLAGS -DKBUILD_BASENAME=pty -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c -o pty.o pty.c > > gcc $CFLAGS -DKBUILD_BASENAME=misc -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c -o misc.o misc.c > > gcc $CFLAGS -DKBUILD_BASENAME=random -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c -o random.o random.c > > gcc $CFLAGS -DKBUILD_BASENAME=vt -c -o vt.o vt.c > > gcc $CFLAGS -DKBUILD_BASENAME=vc_screen -c -o vc_screen.o vc_screen.c
Not bad, I suppose different people prefer different approaches, anyway. There is, however, still redundant output there, the "-o vt.o" and "KBUILD_BASENAME=vt" should go away as well too, IMO.
Anyway, I'll be out of town for a couple of days, if you want to see what I'm up to, take a look at linux-isdn.bkbits.net, linux-2.5.make and linux-2.5.make-new - What I'm doing for the quiet output is pretty flexible, it can be easily adapted to things like the above.
I'd surely appreciate if people wanted to test things, if you don't have bitkeeper but want to give it a shot, I can mail a patch.
(For the visually most prominent change, add "quiet" to your make command line, or set KBUILD_QUIET=1 in the environment)
--Kai
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |