lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: khttpd rotten?


On Thu, 9 May 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:49:12AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
> > > 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
> > > it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.
> >
> > Okay, what about the following:
> >
> > Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer?
> >
> > I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the
> > thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the
> > tree.
> >
> > If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing
> > the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely.
>
> If khttpd is out-of-tree I volunteer for collecting patches if that
> is enough for the maintainer status. But I have to admit that I don't
> really care for it..
> -
I do care, but I have no time at all.
Onestly, I do not think I am the only one using khttpd fruitfully, but I
tend to suspect that people using it are more silent in front of people
who do not care for it.





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.090 / U:8.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site