[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] initramfs
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:14:51PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Anyway, the real problem with iniramfs is on the build side. I.e. what
> do we want in makefiles for early userland/what do we want to use as
> libc?

I have the start of a libc, based on your original "libc" in your
original initramfs patches, merged with some of my initial klibc 0.1
work <> which was based
off of dietLibc.

It's available at if people want
to poke around with it. I'll dust it off this week, and post a clean
tarball, as it's been on hold.

Actually, in looking at that archive, it doesn't seem to have the latest
stuff checked in...I'll go find it in the morning...

I too am interested in how the makefiles and build process will work :)


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.046 / U:12.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site