[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.13 IDE 50
On 4 May 2002 21:53, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Uz.ytkownik Tim Schmielau napisa?:
> >>- Fix wrong usage of time_after in ide.c. This should cure the drive
> >>seek
> >> timeout problems some people where expierencing. This was clarified
> >>to me by
> >> Bartek, who apparently checked whatever the actual code is consistent
> >>with the comments in front of it. Thank you Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz.
> >>
> >> I think now that we should have time_past(xxx) in <linux/timer.h>.
> >
> > What would you suppose time_past(xxx) to do?
> Taking only a single parameter and telling whatever jiffies is bigger
> then it. Just that. Becouse if you grep for time_after or time_before
> you would realize immediately that nearly all of them take
> the variable jiffies as parameter.

Just in case it will be done: call it
jiffies_before(x) and jiffies_after(x), this sounds unambiguous IMHO.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.060 / U:5.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site