[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback
At 23:47 03/05/02, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>On 3 May 2002 10:49, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Changing unix is doable _if_ you can show a significant benefit.
> > The more utilities you want to break, the more benefit you need to show.
> > I don't think you can send the inode to the land of
> > "8-char limited passwords" by pushing "simpler management of fstabs"
> > though.
>I'm afraid I can't present benefits big enough.
>I was thinking of fs driver (NFS,reiser,NTFS,FAT,...) developers'
>pain, not about my /etc/fstab editing.

NTFS has native inode numbers which are persistent across reboot so this is
a non-issue. The only thing is that inode numbers on ntfs are 64 bit and
not 32 bit but that is much a user space issue as a kernel issue...

Best regards,


"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on
WWW: &

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.085 / U:6.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site