Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 May 2002 18:23:24 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.19-pre9 | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:34:23 -0300 (BRT)
> > <davem@nuts.ninka.net> (02/05/06 1.383.11.22) > > soft-fp fix:
David, Greg, and others, please, more readable changelogs :) I don't understand what people want in that particular kind of case. I made software fp emulation fixes, four of them to be precise. And on the first line I describe in general what I'm doing, which is soft-fp bug fixes :-)
I do the same thing for a batch of sparc64 fixes, the first line always is the toplevel description:
sparc64 fixes:
which proceeds the actual details:
- Fix signal blah handling - Don't bleh during ptrace - Disable interrupts around foo - Fix IP checksum calculations when bar
Now tell me what is more appropriate on the first line and I'll consider it :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |