lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 8-CPU (SMP) #s for lockfree rtcache
    Date
    Hello!

    > I also balk at implicit locking...

    rcu is not implicit. At least in the only demo, which I have read
    i.e. in routing cache, it is more explicit than spinlocks are. :-)

    I also strongly dislike any kind of implicit serialization and even
    not standard serialization. So, rcu used in route.c is supposed
    to be cleaned of assembly style code and converted to something
    more intelligible.

    Alexey
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.021 / U:97.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site