Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 May 2002 03:12:36 +0200 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: 2.4 SRMMU bug revisited |
| |
> > What kinds of heavy loads? If you were triggering the out of nocache > > memory BUG, then this patch may help. I fixes a bug where fork fails and > > calls destroy_context on the parent's mm or more precisely a memcpy'd > > duplicate of it. In that case when fork returns to the parent, it > > continuously faults. > > > > But if your load does not fork heavily, then this is probably not the > > problem. > > It seems this is in the bitkeeper tree, so ignore that if you used the > bitkeeper tree. However I'd still like to know what sort of loads are > causing you problems.
Jup, I used the bk tree.
n=100 i=0 while [ ! "$i" = "$n" ]; do echo test|mail -s test user@targetmachine i=$(expr $i + 1) done
targetmachine (running sendmail) goes down in under 20 seconds.
T. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |