Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 26 May 2002 07:26:37 -0600 | From | yodaiken@fsmlabs ... | Subject | Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)] |
| |
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:11:38AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > lm@bitmover.com said: > > On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 05:22:43PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > > > To get a free patent license, EVERYTHING must be GPL. > > > Not just the real-time part! So that would be: > > > > > > 1. the RT microkernel (OK) > > > 2. the RT "app" (OK) > > > 3. Linux itself (OK) > > > 4. normal Linux apps (ouch!) > > > Whether that is true or not I don't know. But I do know that if all > > the stuff was GPLed, then you are safe no matter what, right? > > It's been asserted that the patent licence requires that _all_ userspace > apps running on the system by GPL'd. Yet there are many Free Software > applications in a standard Linux distribution that are under > GPL-incompatible licences. Apache, xinetd, etc... > > If that interpretation is true, it _would_ be a problem, and not just for > those trying to make money from it.
That interpretation is not just false, it is silly.
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |