lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Quota patches
hi Linus,

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:03:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Jan Kara wrote:
> > ... . If he has newer tools
> > (<3.05) he has to decide depending on format he wants to use...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> This makes me pretty certain we just do not want to have the backwards-
> compatibility layer in 2.5.x
>
> Are there _any_ reasons to use the old stuff, if the fix is just to
> upgrade to a newer quota tool?

Moving to newer interfaces implies use of the new ondisk format
for the quota files (exclusively) - I'd imagine that's the main
reason behind providing a choice. Whether or not that reason is
sufficently compelling though... dunno. If one wanted to be able
to switch between booting either 2.4 (unpatched) and 2.5+, and
also maintain quota information on filestystems, then the choice
would be useful in that situation.

cheers.

--
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans