Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 May 2002 12:35:10 +1000 | From | Nathan Scott <> | Subject | Re: Quota patches |
| |
hi Linus,
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:03:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 23 May 2002, Jan Kara wrote: > > ... . If he has newer tools > > (<3.05) he has to decide depending on format he wants to use... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This makes me pretty certain we just do not want to have the backwards- > compatibility layer in 2.5.x > > Are there _any_ reasons to use the old stuff, if the fix is just to > upgrade to a newer quota tool?
Moving to newer interfaces implies use of the new ondisk format for the quota files (exclusively) - I'd imagine that's the main reason behind providing a choice. Whether or not that reason is sufficently compelling though... dunno. If one wanted to be able to switch between booting either 2.4 (unpatched) and 2.5+, and also maintain quota information on filestystems, then the choice would be useful in that situation.
cheers.
-- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |