Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 22 May 2002 18:29:47 -0500 | | From | Daniel Jacobowitz <> | | Subject | Re: PATCH Multithreaded core dumps for the 2.5.17 kernel was ....RE: PATCH Multithreaded core dump support for the 2.5.14 (aO |
| |
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:07:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I think that although my tcore_suspend_threads and Pavel's freeze_processes > > have similar results, I don't think using Pavel's approach for the core dump > > is a good idea. > > Migrating a task to a specific processor is also remarkably related. How does > it wash out if the suspend thread/freeze process stuff works by migrating > all the processes to a CPU that doesnt exist ?
I was under the impression that this is exactly how Mark was doing it, actually. Issues with semaphores aside...
-- Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |