lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PATCH Multithreaded core dumps for the 2.5.17 kernel was ....RE: PATCH Multithreaded core dump support for the 2.5.14 (aO
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:07:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I think that although my tcore_suspend_threads and Pavel's freeze_processes
> > have similar results, I don't think using Pavel's approach for the core dump
> > is a good idea.
>
> Migrating a task to a specific processor is also remarkably related. How does
> it wash out if the suspend thread/freeze process stuff works by migrating
> all the processes to a CPU that doesnt exist ?

I was under the impression that this is exactly how Mark was doing it,
actually. Issues with semaphores aside...

--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog