[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: discontiguous memory platforms

    On Thu, 2 May 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > What I
    > care about is not to clobber the common code with additional overlapping
    > common code abstractions.

    Just to throw in an alternative: On m68k we map currently everything
    together into a single virtual area. This means the virtual<->physical
    conversion is a bit more expensive and mem_map is simply indexed by the
    the virtual address.
    It works nicely, it just needs two small patches in the initializition
    code, which aren't integrated yet. I think it's very close to what Daniel
    wants, only that the logical and virtual address are identical.

    bye, Roman

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:8.334 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site