[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: module choices affecting base kernel size???
On Thu, 2 May 2002 20:57:40 -0400 (EDT), 
Tom Oehser <> wrote:
>> Tom Oehser <> wrote:
>> >Changing all =m to =n in my config makes a 4K difference in the kernel size.
>On Fri, 3 May 2002, Keith Owens wrote:
>> The majority of modules have no effect on kernel size but some modules
>> require base kernel code as well. This is typically common code or low
>> level setup functions. You will find that those modules will not load
>> now or will break.
>Great. I must have missed the list of exactly *which* modules do this...
>Any ideas on a reasonable way of how to identify them?

Not easy. Some of it is in the Makefiles, some of it is in the code.
Looking for conditional EXPORT_SYMBOLS() will find some of the extra
space, I don't know of any way of finding all of the extra code/data,
apart from compiling and measuring.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.090 / U:1.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site