[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel
> >So what should it point to?  I have had more trouble when some Debian
> >package made it not a symlink and if I tried to compile something
> >which needed correct headers for the version I am using I get very
> >strange errors which are hard to diagnose.
> Linus has spoken. /usr/include/{linux,asm} must not be a symlink that
> points to kernel code that is updated. glibc must contain the linux
> and asm files that were used to build glibc and those files must not
> change until you change glibc. glibc must take a copy of the kernel
> headers at glibc build time or (much less desirable) it can symlink to
> a set of kernel headers that are guaranteed to never change.
> Having glibc linking to some random set of kernel headers is a recipe
> for disaster. kbuild 2.5 deliberately handles the asm symlink
> differently from the old kbuild system, to detect and correct broken
> installations.

Fair enough. I suggest, though, that you put a similar explanation
into kbuild 2.5 documentation.


"hello it's not like i read my mail so that you have where to offer to sell me
a giant turnip or anything else thankyou." -tomas szepe <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.052 / U:0.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site