Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: Bug: Discontigmem virt_to_page() [Alpha,ARM,Mips64?] | Date | Thu, 2 May 2002 21:27:00 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 02 May 2002 21:19, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:41:36PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Dropping the loop when discontigmem is enabled is much more interesting > > optimization of course. > > Andrea > > Absolutely; I'd be very supportive of improvements for this case as well. > Many of the systems with the need for discontiguous memory support will > also benefit from parallelizations or other methods of avoiding references > to remote nodes/zones or iterations over all nodes/zones.
Which loop in which function are we talking about?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |