lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Process priority in 2.4.18 (RedHat 7.3)
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:51:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > For a 10Mbit ne2k it ought to be if its done with sched fifo. For serious
> > > devices its not. The ksoftirqd bounce blows everything out of cache and is
> > > easily measured
> >
> > if you're under a flood of irq ksoftirqd or not won't make differences
>
> I didnt mention a flood of irqs. If stuff falls back to softirqd it
> materially harms throughput

You did implicitly becuse if there's not a flood of irq or recursive
softirqs it cannot fall to sofitrqd.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.055 / U:3.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site