[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Changelogs on
Helge Hafting wrote:

>Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>(speaking more to the crowd...)
>>Changeset comments need to be written as if they stand alone, without
>>any other context -- including the author. A reader should not need to
>>know that (for examples) James Simmons hacks on fbdev stuff.
>I think it is nice to have the names. A new kernel
>might break something, It is then nice to know
>where to send the bug report. (It is usually, but not
>necessarily the maintainer that did it.)

Having the name is fine -- I agree it should not be removed.

However, that was not the point of my message. The point is, each
changeset comment comes with -no context at all-. If the author of the
comment assumes that, by his name, we can figure out what a comment like
"minor fixes" mean, that author is making a mistake. Each cset comment
needs to tell exactly what the change is, and should not require
knowledge of the author's identity to determine what is in the changeset.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.157 / U:1.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site