[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Changelogs on
Generally the defense that "no one else is saying anything" is not a
good one - especially b/c it opens up a huge space for others to agree
with the original argument. And yes, they are illegible.

In fact, I believe that when things originally moved to BK, there was
some discussion that although it was a step in the right direction, it
needed to be cleaned up a little bit.


On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 21:09, john slee wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:09AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > I dont know who to write to about this, but the changelogs for
> > 2.4.19-pre on are COMPLETELY illegible.
> you seem to be the only one publicly complaining. go write a procmail
> recipe to fix them up.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.169 / U:8.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site