lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Combined low latency & performance patches for 2.4.18
Date
Mark

On Wed, 1 May 2002 18:13, you wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 02:51, you wrote:
> > > After applying it, if you ever do a make mrproper oldconfig dep bzImage
> > > it fails to compile sched.c as follows
> > >
> > > If I don't do an mrproper it compiles ok. Haven't tested yet.
> >
> > Hmm
> > I used a make mrproper && make clean followed by manual configuration
> > without any problems but thanks for your input. I'm not claiming to be a
> > patch or kernel guru. Just offering what worked for me.
> >
> > > It's the O1 sched patch. Not your fault....
> >
> > Thanks thats kinda reassuring :)
> >
> > Con.
>
> I take that back. It's the low-latency patch. You must have said no to
> it in your .config.
> I do not think all these patches play well together with the O(1)

Here is the relevant section from my .config:

# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_LOLAT=y
# CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL is not set

CONFIG_PREEMPT=y

As you can see, the low latency is enabled. I didn't see any point in
enabling sysctl so I havent tried that. Perhaps that is it? The other thing
is, I don't believe it works well with SMP which I am not using.

Con.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.063 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site