[lkml]   [2002]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] percpu updates
Brian Gerst wrote:
> These patches convert some of the existing arrays based on NR_CPUS to
> use the new per cpu code.
> ...
> -extern struct page_state {
> +struct page_state {
> unsigned long nr_dirty;
> unsigned long nr_locked;
> unsigned long nr_pagecache;
> -} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp page_states[NR_CPUS];
> +};
> +
> +extern struct page_state __per_cpu_data page_states;

When I did this a couple of weeks back it failed in
mysterious ways and I ended up parking it. Failure
symptoms included negative numbers being reported in
/proc/meminfo for "Locked" and "Dirty".

How well has this been tested? (If the answer
is "not very" then please wait until I've tested
it out...)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.097 / U:5.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site