[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:53:38AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> If you are going to be doing strange things I don't see why that shouldn't
> still be required.

Practically speaking is often wrongly installed. Additionally
Keith Owens has (sensibly I think) refused to support this sort of

> Though I am wondering if the sane approach for a profiler might not to be
> have a kernel conditional compilation directive that simply patches
> the syscall path. The overhead is probably less as well.

This would be OK for us, iff it was on by default. We want to avoid
forcing users to install kernel source and compile up a new kernel,
because it's not just useful for kernel profiling.

Currently it's just a matter of install the module and go, which is
undeniably very useful.


"I never understood what's so hard about picking a unique
first and last name - and not going beyond the 6 character limit."
- Toon Moene
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.062 / U:1.316 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site