[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:41:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:49:17PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Removing it in the -ac tree is a good way to stimulate discussion
> OK
> > fixing the code that relies on it (except for the 99% of code relying on it
> > which is cracker authored trojans)
> No doubt, but it's not much harder to look at nm vmlinux or,
> so I don't see the security angle...
> I'd be happy to bear the brunt of users moaning at me because they now
> have to apply a kernel patch (and I have to maintain it ...), iff there
> was some strongly technical reason the code has to change.

I'd like to second that. syscalltrack (
hijacks syscall entries in the sys_call_table as well, because we
want it to work as a module and not require patching the kernel. Our
solution to the module unload race on syscall de-hijacking is simple,
splitting the system call hijacking code into a single small module
which once loaded cannot be unloaded.

So please keep the sys_call_table exported and marked as "ugh, not
portable and racy, please dont hijack system calls unless you really
have to" unless there's a strongly technical reason otherwise. Our
users (all 7 of them) will appreciate it ;)
The ill-formed Orange
Fails to satisfy the eye:
Segmentation fault.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.089 / U:1.660 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site