[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules...
    On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:35:33PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
    > > disappeared). Then, to make your thoughts consistent you would need to
    > > disable the exported interfaces required for development of a journalling
    > You assume EXPORT_SYMBOL is an exported, stable interface
    > that constitutes a GPL barrier. I disagree with
    > that and I think quite a few others do too.

    The fact that users have problems with different binary-only
    modules not being available for the same kernel version seems
    to prove that the "interface" EXPORT_SYMBOL "defines" isn't

    If it was, we'd have an nvidia driver for 2.4, not a whole
    serie for each 2.4.x kernel.


    Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.020 / U:36.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site