[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules...
> adding export symbol here and there it's the same thing you did in the
> redhat kernel and in your tux patches here:

Nothing to do with me. I suspect Ingo and DaveM both discussed it however.

> vmalloc_to_page. Now if you claim that that's not legal, then I claim
> all binary only drivers out there are completly illegal, because they

That is a possible situation. No lawyer I've talked to is prepared to give
a definitive answer on the question of whether it is a derivative work. In
the UK case it recently got even more complex because a judge ruled that
loading a program into memory is clearly an act of copying.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.185 / U:21.624 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site