Messages in this thread |  | | From | David Woodhouse <> | Subject | Re: How to enable printk | Date | Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:14:53 +0100 |
| |
vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua said: > Hey, hey... do you expect users to patch all those printk() calls in > their kernel themself? Realistically they can:
I was talking about vendors setting silly defaults. One can reasonably expect _vendors_ to fix printks with wrong or no priority rather than just disabling them all.
There's a lot of crap at KERN_NOTICE that could be sanely ignored by default. Stuff at KERN_WARNING probably ought to be printed by default. It can often precede and explain a crash.
> * send patches to lkml and be ignored
There are more sensible places to send patches than lkml.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |